How are we going?

Cluster Progress Indicators

How do we measure our cluster progress in the implementation of ICTs in teaching and learning?

BTG Baseline Audit Survey

Also available to BTG Cluster schools on Survey Monkey

BTG Cluster Goals Rubric

BTG Cluster Goals Survey

Also available to BTG Cluster schools on Survey Monkey

HOT SOLO Coded Self-Assessment ICTPD Rubrics

SOLO coded self-assessment rubrics developed against New Zealand ICTPD Cluster National and Cluster Goals

Example of these rubrics being used to assess the SustainED ICTPD Cluster Teacher Responses for ms_5 and the BTG Cluster Teacher Responses for ms_1

external image pdf.png SustainED Milestone Goals Rubrics.pdf

external image pdf.png [[file/view/BTG Cluster Goals Rubrics.pdf|BTG Cluster Goals Rubrics.pdf]]

BECTA Self-review framework

A free online positioning tool for reviewing and improving your school's use of ICTs


ICT Strategic Plan for use with ICTPD Clusters

A paper version of the BECTA Self Review Framework tweaked to suit needs of New Zealand ICT_PD Cluster Schools
external image pdf.png Framework for Developing a Strategic Plan for Learning Through ICT.pdf

Review Rubric for ICTPD Cluster Proposals 2010 to 2012

A paper version mash up of the Becta ICT Self Review Framework and the National Support Service Cluster Review (draft 2009)
external image msword.png ReviewRubric.doc

Other Approaches

There are a number of self assessment questionnaires around that purport to measure teacher use of ICTs.

However, many of them are focused on knowledge of software applications or the ability to manage files like this ICT survey from a New Zealand Intermediate school.
external image msword.png ICT_Survey_.doc

Knezek and Christensen have a six stage model (download) to estimate teacher’s level of technology adoption, which was used by Kwok-Wing Lai for his Otago University research into integration of ICTs into the New Zealand Curriculum,
external image msword.png Knezek's Stages of adoption.doc

but for my reckoning Christopher Moersch’s The Levels of Technology Implementation(LoTi) scale seems a much smarter instrument for us to consider using in the SustainED ict_pd cluster.
external image msword.png Levels of Technology Implementation (LoTi).doc

In 1994, Dr. Christopher Moersch developed the Levels of Technology Implementation (LoTi) scale in an effort to accurately measure authentic classroom technology use. This scale focuses on the use of technology as an interactive learning medium because this particular component has the greatest and lasting impact on classroom pedagogy and is the most difficult to implement and assess. The challenge is not merely to use technology to achieve isolated tasks (e.g., word processing a research paper, creating a multimedia slide show, browsing the Internet), but rather to integrate technology in an exemplary manner that supports purposeful problem-solving, performance-based assessment practices, and experiential learning--all vital characteristics of the Target Technology level established by the CEO Forum on Education and Technology.

I found this post from the blog of the Cool Cat Teacher and her assessment tool that assesses the five phases of the path to create what she terms the flat classroom. I think that this is an interesting take on the self assessment process for ICT implementation within a classroom and its effectiveness.

MoE Milestone Reporting

Milestone Rubric

CoreEd Meaty Milestone

external image NDA4NjlkNmJkNDgzZTFjZWE4MzQmb2Y9MA==.gif

Please add any of your favourites to this assessment resource